Applicable large employer: the ACA employer mandate, ALE status and 4980H penalties

You are an applicable large employer if you averaged 50 or more full time employees, counting full time equivalents, across the 12 months of the prior calendar year. Status is set by last year and applies for the whole of this one. For 2026 the exposure is $3,340 per full time employee under section 4980H(a) and $5,010 under 4980H(b), and coverage is affordable at 9.96% of income.

The calculator prices all three at once: whether you are an ALE, what a failure to offer would cost, and the highest monthly premium you can charge your lowest paid employee while still clearing the affordability test. Below: the full indexed penalty table from 2015 to 2026, which continues past the point where the IRS stopped publishing its own.

Runs in your browser, nothing is sent anywhere

Applicable large employer calculator

1. Are you an applicable large employer

Full time equivalents
Full time plus FTEs

rounds down to , which is 50 or more, so this is an applicable large employer for the following calendar year. rounds down to , which is under 50, so this is not an applicable large employer.

2. What a failure to offer would cost in 2026

Full time, less 30
4980H(a) per year

employees at $3,340 each (Rev. Proc. 2025-26). Full time equivalents never appear in this line, only real full time employees. The separate 4980H(b) amount is $5,010 for each full time employee who receives a premium tax credit.

3. Affordability, rate of pay safe harbor

Maximum affordable
130 hours x rate x 9.96%

is at or below , so this offer is affordable under the rate of pay safe harbor. exceeds , so this offer is not affordable under the rate of pay safe harbor and 4980H(b) is live for that employee.

The rate of pay safe harbor starts with your lowest band minimum.

Build a band
Definition

What an applicable large employer actually is

An applicable large employer is an employer that employed an average of at least 50 full time employees, including full time equivalents, on business days during the preceding calendar year. That is the whole definition, and it comes from 26 U.S.C. 4980H(c)(2). Nothing about revenue, industry or whether you already offer coverage enters into it.

Two things follow from the status, and they are separate obligations. The first is the employer shared responsibility provision: offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95% of your full time employees and their dependents, and make the lowest cost self only option both affordable and minimum value. The second is reporting, on Forms 1094-C and 1095-C, which you owe whether or not you ever face a payment.

Note who "dependents" covers, because employers routinely assume it is broader than it is. 26 CFR 54.4980H-1(a)(12) defines a dependent as a child under 26 and then says plainly: "The term dependent does not include the spouse of an employee." So the mandate never reaches a spouse, let alone a domestic partner. Extending the plan to a partner is a choice rather than an obligation, and once you make it the employer contribution becomes imputed income on the employee's W-2 unless the partner independently qualifies as their tax dependent.

The word most often missed in the definition is preceding. Status is always determined by the prior calendar year and then applies for the whole of the current one. A company that grows past 50 during 2026 is an applicable large employer for 2027, starting January 1. It owes nothing for 2026 no matter how large it gets, and it cannot shrink its way out of 2027 by cutting staff in February. The lag is deliberate: it gives a growing employer roughly a year to put a compliant plan in place before the duties attach.

The test in five steps

  1. 1. For each month of last year, count employees averaging 130 hours of service.
  2. 2. Add up everyone else's monthly hours, counting no more than 120 for any one person.
  3. 3. Divide that total by 120. Those are your full time equivalents.
  4. 4. Add the two figures together, month by month, then average the 12 months.
  5. 5. Round down. Fifty or more and you are an applicable large employer.

The arithmetic in steps 1 to 3 is set out in detail, with the rounding rules and the seasonal worker exception, on the FTE calculator. This page picks up where the count ends.

Amounts

Every indexed 4980H amount, 2015 to 2026

The statute sets the two penalties at $2,000 and $3,000 and then indexes them by the premium adjustment percentage, rounded down to the next lowest multiple of $10. The IRS publishes a table of the results in its employer shared responsibility Q&A, but that table stops at 2023, even though the page itself was last reviewed in July 2026. The figures for 2024 onward exist only in individual revenue procedures. Here they are in one place.

Indexed section 4980H(a) and 4980H(b) employer shared responsibility amounts by calendar year
Calendar year 4980H(a), per full time employee 4980H(b), per credit recipient Source
2015$2,080$3,120IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2016$2,160$3,240IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2017$2,260$3,390IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2018$2,320$3,480IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2019$2,500$3,750IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2020$2,570$3,860IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2021$2,700$4,060IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2022$2,750$4,120IRS ESRP Q&A 55
2023$2,880$4,320IRS ESRP Q&A 55, last year published there
2024$2,970$4,460Rev. Proc. 2023-17
2025$2,900$4,350Rev. Proc. 2024-14
2026$3,340$5,010Rev. Proc. 2025-26

Read down the first column and two things stand out that no summary of the 2026 numbers mentions. The first is that 2025 went down. The 4980H(a) amount fell from $2,970 to $2,900, a $70 decrease and the only year over year drop since the provision took effect, because the premium adjustment percentage itself fell from 1.4899877401 to 1.4519093322. The second is the size of the 2026 move: a 15.2% jump in a single year, against annual changes that had run between 1.9% and 7.8% for a decade.

2026

Why the 2026 numbers jumped, and it was not premiums

The 2026 amounts rose 15.2% because the measuring stick changed, not because health premiums suddenly spiked. Rev. Proc. 2025-25 says so directly: beginning in calendar year 2026, HHS guidance provides a new premium growth measure that captures increases in individual market premiums in addition to increases in employer sponsored insurance premiums.

Until 2025 the premium adjustment percentage was built on per enrollee spending for employer sponsored insurance alone. The Marketplace Integrity and Affordability rule at 90 Fed. Reg. 27074, published June 25, 2025, added individual market premiums to that measure. Individual market premiums have grown faster, so the index moved sharply, and everything pinned to it moved with it: both penalty amounts and the affordability percentage.

This matters practically because the affordability number moved in the employer's favor while the penalty moved against it. The required contribution percentage went from 9.02% for 2025 to 9.96% for 2026, which means you can charge an employee meaningfully more in 2026 and still clear the affordability test. At a $22 hourly rate the maximum affordable monthly contribution under the rate of pay safe harbor rises from $257.97 to $284.86, an extra $26.88 a month per employee that you no longer have to absorb.

Affordability percentage

2024
8.39%
2025
9.02%
2026
9.96%

Rev. Proc. 2023-29, 2024-35 and 2025-25 respectively. The percentage is written into the regulations as 9.5%, and every safe harbor in 26 CFR 54.4980H-5 is stated at 9.5% before adjustment. Use the indexed figure for the plan year, not the number in the regulation.

Counting

The same workforce is counted twice, two different ways

The single most expensive misunderstanding on this topic is treating the ALE threshold count and the penalty count as the same number. They are not. Full time equivalents decide whether the mandate applies to you at all, then vanish completely from the arithmetic that decides what you owe. An employer with 30 full time employees and 25 FTEs is an applicable large employer, but its 4980H(a) exposure is zero, because 30 minus the 30 employee reduction leaves nothing.

How the ALE status count differs from the 4980H penalty count
Question Who is counted Which year Source
Are you an applicable large employer Full time employees plus full time equivalents, averaged over 12 months The preceding calendar year 26 U.S.C. 4980H(c)(2); 26 CFR 54.4980H-2
What a failure to offer costs, 4980H(a) Full time employees only, minus 30. Equivalents excluded entirely The current year, month by month 26 U.S.C. 4980H(a), (c)(1)
What an unaffordable offer costs, 4980H(b) Only full time employees who actually receive a premium tax credit. No reduction The current year, month by month 26 U.S.C. 4980H(b)(1)
Who gets a Form 1095-C Every full time employee, whether or not coverage was offered or taken The current year 26 U.S.C. 6056

The 30 employee reduction is what makes the difference between the two payments so lopsided in practice. Missing the 95% offer threshold by one person exposes your entire full time payroll less 30, at $3,340 each. Getting the offer right but pricing it slightly too high exposes only the employees who go to the Marketplace and qualify for a credit, at $5,010 each. For a 60 person employer, the first is $100,200 and the second is often a few thousand dollars. The higher headline rate is attached to the far cheaper failure.

Hours

Paid time off counts here, and does not count for overtime

An hour of service under the ACA is not the same thing as an hour worked under the Fair Labor Standards Act, and the difference runs in the direction most employers do not expect. 26 CFR 54.4980H-1(a)(24) defines an hour of service as each hour for which an employee is paid for the performance of duties, and each hour for which an employee is paid or entitled to payment for a period during which no duties are performed.

The regulation then lists what that second half covers, and the list is not short: vacation, holiday, illness, incapacity including disability, layoff, jury duty, military duty and leave of absence. Every one of those hours counts toward the 130 hour full time line and toward the 120 hour equivalency divisor.

Now put that next to the overtime rule. Under the FLSA, paid leave is not hours worked at all, which is why an employee who takes eight hours of vacation and then works 36 hours has 44 paid hours and no overtime. The identical PTO hour is invisible to one federal rulebook and fully counted by the other. A part time employee sitting just under the line on worked hours can be pushed over 130 by paid leave alone, becoming a full time employee for mandate purposes without a single extra hour of work being performed.

Three categories are carved out of hours of service entirely, and they are worth knowing because each removes real people from the count. Bona fide volunteer hours do not count, which matters to nonprofit employers. Federal Work-Study hours do not count. And hours whose compensation is income from sources outside the United States do not count, which is how a US company with staff working abroad can stay under 50 despite a larger global headcount.

One PTO hour, two answers

ACA hours of service Counts
FLSA hours worked, for overtime Does not count
Jury duty, paid Counts (ACA)
Paid military duty Counts (ACA)
Bona fide volunteer hours Excluded
Work performed outside the US Excluded

26 CFR 54.4980H-1(a)(24)(i) and (ii). The overtime side of the contrast is set out on FLSA overtime and in the accrual mechanics on the PTO calculator.

Affordability

The three affordability safe harbors, and which one to pick

Affordability is defined against the employee's household income, which no employer knows. So 26 CFR 54.4980H-5(e)(2) gives three substitutes you are allowed to measure instead. Using one is optional, and you may apply different harbors to different groups, provided you do it on a uniform and consistent basis for any reasonable category. The regulation names job categories, hourly versus salaried, and geographic location as reasonable. It expressly rules out picking employees by name, or by any criterion having substantially the same effect.

Comparison of the Form W-2, rate of pay and federal poverty line affordability safe harbors
Safe harbor Measured against Known when The trap
Form W-2 9.96% of that employee's Form W-2 wages from you for the calendar year After the year ends Determined employee by employee in arrears, so it cannot guide pricing in advance. The contribution must also stay a consistent amount or percentage all year
Rate of pay 9.96% of 130 hours times the hourly rate, or of monthly salary for salaried staff Start of the coverage period For salaried employees the harbor is lost outright if monthly salary is reduced, including through a cut in hours. For hourly staff you must use the lowest rate in the month
Federal poverty line 9.96% of the federal poverty line for a single individual, divided by 12 Start of the plan year Gives one flat dollar ceiling for everyone, so it is the most conservative and usually the most expensive. Uses the poverty line for the state where the employee works

Which one small employers should actually use

For a company under 200 people the rate of pay safe harbor is usually the right default, because it is the only one that is both prospective and sensitive to what you actually pay. You can compute the ceiling in open enrollment, set the contribution under it, and know the answer before the plan year starts. The W-2 harbor cannot do that, since it is settled after December 31. The poverty line harbor can, but it prices everyone at the floor, so you give up the ability to charge more to your better paid employees.

The reason it works is that the ceiling is a straight function of pay. At 9.96% of 130 hours, every extra dollar of hourly rate buys $12.95 a month of headroom on the employee contribution. That makes your salary bands a benefits input, not just a payroll one: the bottom of your lowest band sets the maximum premium you can charge anyone in it.

The mid year pay cut that voids the harbor

The rate of pay harbor carries a condition that is easy to trip over. For a non hourly employee, the regulation says that if the monthly salary is reduced, including because of a reduction in work hours, the safe harbor is simply not available for that employee. There is no proration and no partial credit. A salaried person moved to a four day week mid year loses the protection for the year, and affordability for them reverts to the actual household income test you cannot measure.

For hourly employees the rule is gentler but still bites: you use the lower of the rate on the first day of the coverage period or the lowest hourly rate during the calendar month. A temporary rate reduction therefore lowers the affordability ceiling for that month, even if the employee's normal rate is higher.

Groups

Related companies are counted as one employer

Common ownership collapses separate companies into a single employer for the 50 employee test. Section 4980H(c)(2)(C) applies the controlled group and affiliated service group rules of section 414(b), (c), (m) and (o), so four commonly owned companies of 20 people each are not four small employers. They are one aggregated applicable large employer of 80, and every one of them is inside the mandate.

Then the group splits apart again for everything that follows. Each company is an applicable large employer member, and liability is determined separately for each one, based only on its own full time employees. The 30 employee reduction does not go to whichever entity needs it most; it is allocated ratably across the group in proportion to each member's full time headcount. A member with 40 of the group's 200 full time employees gets 20% of the reduction, which is 6, not 30.

One more aggregation rule is easy to miss and cuts the other way, in the employee's favor. Under 26 CFR 54.4980H-1(a)(24)(iii), an hour of service for one applicable large employer member counts as an hour of service for all the others, for the whole period they are in the same group. Someone splitting time across two sister companies at 70 hours each is not two part time employees. They are one full time employee at 140 hours, owed an offer.

Tested together, billed separately

Counted as one group
The 50 employee ALE test. Hours of service across members.
Handled per member
Liability for 4980H(a) and (b). The 95% offer test. Form 1094-C filing. The 30 employee reduction, allocated by share of full time employees.
Why it matters
A holding structure that looks like several sub-50 businesses is frequently one ALE. Ownership, not branding or payroll provider, decides it.
Filing

What an applicable large employer has to file

Reporting is a separate obligation from the payment, and it is the one you owe every single year regardless of whether anything is due. Under section 6056 an applicable large employer files a Form 1095-C for each full time employee and a Form 1094-C transmittal covering the member. You file for every full time employee, including the ones who declined coverage and the ones you never offered it to, because the form is how the IRS learns which is which.

Who files

Each applicable large employer member files its own 1094-C. Aggregation does not consolidate the filing, and there is no group return.

Electronic threshold

Ten or more information returns of all types combined, counted together, forces electronic filing through the AIR system. In practice every ALE is over it.

How assessment starts

Letter 226J, which itemizes the proposed payment month by month and marks each month as 4980H(a), 4980H(b) or neither. You respond on Form 14764.

Letter 226J is worth understanding before it arrives, because a proposed payment is not a final one. The letter lists the employees the IRS believes received a premium tax credit, and a substantial share of proposed assessments come from coding errors on the 1095-C rather than from an actual failure to offer coverage. If the offer was made and the affordability safe harbor was available, the response form is where you say so. That is also why the safe harbor you relied on needs to be documented at the time you set contributions, not reconstructed two years later.

Planning

If you are sitting near 50

The 50 line is an annual average, not a ceiling you cross once. That is the useful part. An employer that runs at 48 for ten months and 58 for two averages 49.67, rounds down to 49 and is not an applicable large employer. Rounding is always downward, so the fractional part is free.

Three things move the average that are not headcount decisions. Hours of service for variable hour staff are the largest lever, since every 120 monthly hours you shed is one whole FTE off the count. Work performed outside the United States drops out of the calculation entirely. And the seasonal worker exception can remove a spike altogether: if you were over 50 for no more than 120 days in the year and everyone above 50 in that window was seasonal, you are not an ALE for that year.

What is not worth doing is engineering the count at the cost of the business. The 30 employee reduction means the arithmetic gets gentler than the threshold suggests. An employer that crosses to 52 full time employees and offers nothing faces 22 times $3,340, which is $73,480. The same employer offering a compliant plan to 95% of them faces exposure only for those who still go to the Marketplace and qualify for a credit.

And the timing works in your favor if you use it. Crossing in 2026 means the duties start January 1, 2027. That is a full plan year of lead time to select coverage, set contributions under the affordability ceiling, and get hours tracking in place. Employers who get caught are almost always the ones who did not realize they had crossed, not the ones who could not afford the plan.

Questions

Applicable large employer questions

What is an applicable large employer?

An applicable large employer is an employer that averaged 50 or more full time employees, including full time equivalents, on business days during the preceding calendar year. That status is what makes the ACA employer shared responsibility provisions in section 4980H apply to you, along with the Form 1094-C and 1095-C reporting duties.

How do you calculate applicable large employer status?

For each month of the prior calendar year, count full time employees at 130 hours of service, then add the hours of everyone else, cap each person at 120, and divide that total by 120. Add the two figures, average the 12 months, and round down. Fifty or more makes you an applicable large employer.

Am I an applicable large employer?

You are if last year's 12 month average of full time employees plus full time equivalents came to 50 or more, rounded down. Status is always fixed by the prior calendar year, so a company that crosses 50 in March 2026 becomes an applicable large employer on January 1, 2027, not in March.

What is the penalty for not offering health insurance in 2026?

For 2026 the section 4980H(a) amount is $3,340 per full time employee per year, or $278.33 a month, after subtracting the first 30 full time employees. It is triggered only if at least one full time employee receives a premium tax credit. The figure comes from Rev. Proc. 2025-26.

How much is the 4980H(b) penalty for 2026?

For 2026 it is $5,010 per year, or $417.50 a month, for each full time employee who actually receives a premium tax credit, with no 30 employee reduction. It is capped so it can never exceed what the 4980H(a) payment would have been. Source: Rev. Proc. 2025-26.

What is the ACA affordability percentage for 2026?

It is 9.96% of household income for plan years beginning in 2026, set by Rev. Proc. 2025-25. That is up from 9.02% in 2025, so an employer can charge a higher employee contribution in 2026 and still clear the affordability test for section 4980H(b) purposes.

Do part time employees count toward applicable large employer status?

Yes, through their hours rather than as heads. Their monthly hours of service, capped at 120 each, are divided by 120 to produce full time equivalents that count toward the 50 threshold. They then disappear from the penalty arithmetic entirely, which is computed on actual full time employees only.

What is an applicable large employer member?

An applicable large employer member is one company inside a controlled group that is treated as a single employer for the 50 employee test. The group is tested together, but liability, the Form 1094-C filing and the 30 employee reduction are handled separately by each member, allocated by its share of full time employees.

What is an aggregated applicable large employer group?

It is a set of related companies combined under the section 414(b), (c), (m) and (o) controlled group rules and counted as one employer for the ALE test. Four companies of 20 employees each are not four small employers, they are one applicable large employer of 80.

Do seasonal workers count toward the 50 employee threshold?

They count in the arithmetic, but an exception sits on top of it. If your workforce exceeded 50 for 120 days or fewer during the year, and everyone above 50 in that stretch was a seasonal worker, you are not an applicable large employer for the year. The 120 days need not be consecutive.

Does paid time off count as hours of service for the ACA?

Yes. 26 CFR 54.4980H-1(a)(24) credits every hour an employee is paid or entitled to payment for vacation, holiday, illness, incapacity, layoff, jury duty, military duty or leave of absence. That is the opposite of the FLSA overtime rule, where paid leave is not hours worked.

What is an applicable large employer required to file?

Form 1095-C for each full time employee and a Form 1094-C transmittal for the group, filed with the IRS under sections 6055 and 6056. Any employer filing 10 or more information returns in total must file them electronically through the AIR system rather than on paper.

What are the applicable large employer requirements?

Offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95% of full time employees and their dependents, make the lowest cost self only option affordable and minimum value, track hours of service monthly, and file Forms 1094-C and 1095-C. Failing the first requirement exposes the whole full time payroll, not just one employee.

What happens if you go over 50 employees?

Nothing happens that year. Crossing 50 in the current year makes you an applicable large employer from January 1 of the following year, which is when the offer, affordability and reporting duties start. The gap exists deliberately so you have time to put a compliant plan in place.

Your lowest pay band sets your affordability ceiling.

At 9.96% of 130 hours, every dollar of hourly rate buys $12.95 a month of headroom on what you can charge for coverage. Wagelist builds defensible salary bands for teams under 200, so the bottom of each band is a number you set deliberately rather than one you discover during open enrollment.

Related

Keep going

Get started